Commentary
Home Parent Page About PCDF Books Living Economies Global Civil Society Documents Info Service Archive Other Resources Projects Archive The Great Turning YES! Magazine David C. Korten

The
People-Centered
Development
Forum

Seeking a just, inclusive, and sustainable world that works for all

Home
Parent Page
American Experiment
BALLE Keynote
Commentary
Seattle Thunder

                ****
The Sun interviews David Korten September 2007

"Living Wealth"
YES! Fall 2007

****
Home
Parent Page
Tom Ambrogi
John Cavanagh
Richard Conlin
Lee Drutman
Rich Lang
J. MacDonagh
Raffi
Vicki Robin

               ****
In Loving Memory
Donella H. Meadows (1941-2001)
The Global Citizen

Feedback and Critical Commentary on

"Renewing the American Experiment"
[HTML]  [PDF]

by David C. Korten

The following are excerpts from initial responses of colleagues who have reviewed the paper. Note that some of these were responses to earlier drafts. Note that the author has incorporated many of the suggestions into subsequent revisions. Follow the links to the full response for critical commentary.

John Robbins, author, Diet for a New America and The Food Revolution

The effort to renew the American Experiment is dear to my heart, as it is to yours. Every day I see people seeking, sometimes blindly, sometimes with extraordinary sophistication, to forward this cause. I’ve sometimes called it the deeper American dream, contrasting it with the more superficial dream of making money for its own sake. I believe that someday we will understand that our true purpose is not unlimited consumption, but unlimited compassion.

Vicki Robin, president, New Road Map Foundation

I think there is a structure to "our" story of delight in continuous learning and growth, that this is the nature of the life well lived whereas the structure in the conservative story is of a universe delivered whole by the divine with embedded moral laws and the life well lived is a life that adheres to the highest moral standards required by the Creator. [Read full comment]

Betsy Toll, Living Earth: Gatherings for Deep Change, Portland, Oregon, www.LivingEarthGatherings.org

The reality of vulnerability, helplessness, lack of skill and knowledge with which we each begin our lives positions us as totally dependent on and at the mercy of those large figures of authority and power in our lives; their superior position, and our complete dependence on them, is beyond question. It is, one could say, God’s design. [Read full comment]

Lee Drutman, Communications Director, Citizen Works

My reading of intellectual history is that the elite class has always tried to create a set of myths that justify and enhance its position in society  — The divine right of kings, social Darwinism, etc. But at times, these myths have been exposed as frauds, and when they have, revolutions in society have taken place. [Read full comment]

Kim Corrigan, Education Outreach, Positive Futures Network, Bainbridge Island, WA

Although I found myself nodding my head in total agreement throughout much of the piece, I couldn't help asking, how can we broaden this from an indictment of the elite to an indictment of conventional wisdom? [Read full comment]

John Cavanagh, Executive Director, Institute for Policy Studies, Washington, DC 

We have a values choice: we can have a WalMart economy with everyday low prices but it comes at the price of decency and fairness.  It is screwing workers here and abroad and it is destroying communities.  We can afford to pay a bit more for the values of community, fairness, and decency.   [Read full comment]

Ellison Horne, Celebrating Solutions!, San Francisco

I would add the means to communicate the stories is just as essential.  We recently developed new language for the Solutions project that ties in perfectly with your powerful insights about the need for new stories. [Read full comment]

Tom Ambrogi, retired theologian/professor and advocate on political and economic  issues, Claremont, CA: 

There’s a freshness to the analysis that can be very attractive to thoughtful progressives. It really could energize the whole new dialogue which you suggest and which I find both urgent and exciting. [Read full comment}

Raffi, troubadour, entrepreneur, and founder of the Child Honoring initiative.

As you note, the dilemma you’re describing is not a partisan issue; Clinton’s embrace of NAFTA, near criminalization of poverty, WTO attest to that; the Democrats contributed to the circumvention of democracy via int’l trade agreements. I wonder if the non partisan (systemic) aspect of this needs more emphasis, i.e., this is a systemic problem needing systemic solution. [Read full comment]

Richard Conlin, Seattle City Council Member and Board Member of the Positive Futures Network

I think you are exactly right about the importance of the story and how it has been seized on to persuade people to go along with things that they would otherwise not embrace.  [Read full comment]

Rich Lang, Pastor, Trinity United Methodist Church, Seattle, WA

 I think you are accurate concerning the 'elite sacred story' and I, of course, applaud you for what I think is the REAL CHALLENGE facing progressive people ... the articulation of a New Story.  [Read full comment

Leonard J. Duhl, MD, Professor of Public Health and Urban Planning and Director of International Healthy Cities Foundation <www.healthcities.org>

You deal with most all the issues I have been concerned about, and come up with beginning answers.  We need some strategies and tactics to proceed and reach more Americans.

Evelyn Messinger, Executive Director, Internews Interactive <www.citizenschannel.org>

I was surprised and pleased that you've articulated a concept I've been fiddling with for over a year, in light of the coming election. As you've written, we had better begin generating the positive stories ASAP. I lay this task on the Democratic Party, as this seems the only way to escape the course Bush has set the country on.

Jeffrey T. S. MacDonagh, Socially Responsible Investor

One general concern I had with the paper (perhaps intentional on your part?) was that it focused overwhelmingly on outlining this "neo-royalist elitism," which left very little room for making the case that progressives need "stories" of their own to compete with the elites. [Read full comment]
 

 Updated February 17, 2004  Posted January 11, 2004